Saglia, R. P.R. P.SagliaSánchez-Blázquez, P.P.Sánchez-BlázquezBender, R.R.BenderSimard, L.L.SimardDesai, V.V.DesaiAragón-Salamanca, A.A.Aragón-SalamancaMilvang-Jensen, B.B.Milvang-JensenHalliday, C.C.HallidayJablonka, P.P.JablonkaNoll, S.S.NollPOGGIANTI, Bianca MariaBianca MariaPOGGIANTIClowe, D. I.D. I.CloweDE LUCIA, GABRIELLAGABRIELLADE LUCIAPelló, R.R.PellóRudnick, G.G.RudnickValentinuzzi, T.T.ValentinuzziWhite, S. D. M.S. D. M.WhiteZaritsky, D.D.Zaritsky2020-04-302020-04-3020160004-6361http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12386/24398We discovered a mistake in Eqs. (7) and (10) of Saglia et al. (2010, A&A, 524, A6), which propagates to Tables 8 and 9 and Fig. 25. We revise the tables, the figure and the affected statements in the paper. As a result, the reduction in the luminosity evolution due to the effects of the size and velocity dispersion evolution is smaller than claimed in Saglia et al. (2010).STAMPAenArticle10.1051/0004-6361/201014703e2-s2.0-85007273711000390797900001https://www.aanda.org/articles/aa/abs/2016/12/aa14703e-10/aa14703e-10.html2016A&A...596C...1SFIS/05 - ASTRONOMIA E ASTROFISICA