Repository logo
  • English
  • Italiano
Log In
Have you forgotten your password?
  1. Home
  2. PRODOTTI RICERCA INAF
  3. 1 CONTRIBUTI IN RIVISTE (Journal articles)
  4. 1.01 Articoli in rivista
  5. Mass modelling globular clusters in the Gaiaera: a method comparison using mock data from an N-body simulation of M 4
 

Mass modelling globular clusters in the Gaiaera: a method comparison using mock data from an N-body simulation of M 4

Journal
MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY  
Date Issued
2019
Author(s)
Hénault-Brunet, V.
•
Gieles, M.
•
SOLLIMA, ANTONIO LUIGI  
•
Watkins, L. L.
•
Zocchi, A.
•
Claydon, I.
•
PANCINO, ELENA  
•
Baumgardt, H.
DOI
10.1093/mnras/sty3187
Abstract
As we enter a golden age for studies of internal kinematics and dynamics of Galactic globular clusters (GCs), it is timely to assess the performance of modelling techniques in recovering the mass, mass profile, and other dynamical properties of GCs. Here, we compare different mass-modelling techniques (distribution function (DF)-based models, Jeans models, and a grid of N-body models) by applying them to mock observations from a star-by-star N-body simulation of the GC M 4 by Heggie. The mocks mimic existing and anticipated data for GCs: surface brightness or number density profiles, local stellar mass functions, line-of-sight velocities, and Hubble Space Telescope- and Gaia-like proper motions. We discuss the successes and limitations of the methods. We find that multimass DF-based models, Jeans, and N-body models provide more accurate mass profiles compared to single-mass DF-based models. We highlight complications in fitting the kinematics in the outskirts due to energetically unbound stars associated with the cluster (`potential escapers', captured neither by truncated DF models nor by N-body models of clusters in isolation), which can be avoided with DF-based models including potential escapers, or with Jeans models. We discuss ways to account for mass segregation. For example, three-component DF-based models with freedom in their mass function are a simple alternative to avoid the biases of single-mass models (which systematically underestimate the total mass, half-mass radius, and central density), while more realistic multimass DF-based models with freedom in the remnant content represent a promising avenue to infer the total mass and the mass function of remnants.
Volume
483
Issue
1
Start page
1400
Uri
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12386/28923
Url
https://academic.oup.com/mnras/article/483/1/1400/5211100
Issn Identifier
0035-8711
Ads BibCode
2019MNRAS.483.1400H
Rights
open.access
File(s)
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name

sty3187.pdf

Description
Pdf editoriale
Size

2.33 MB

Format

Adobe PDF

Checksum (MD5)

e7a09f631fa5a3655b3c735df9f06771

Explore By
  • Communities and Collection
  • Research Outputs
  • Researchers
  • Organizations
  • Projects
Information and guides for authors
  • https://openaccess-info.inaf.it: all about open access in INAF
  • How to enter a product: guides to OA@INAF
  • The INAF Policy on Open Access
  • Downloadable documents and templates

Built with DSpace-CRIS software - Extension maintained and optimized by 4Science

  • Privacy policy
  • End User Agreement
  • Send Feedback