Repository logo
  • English
  • Italiano
Log In
Have you forgotten your password?
  1. Home
  2. PRODOTTI RICERCA INAF
  3. 1 CONTRIBUTI IN RIVISTE (Journal articles)
  4. 1.01 Articoli in rivista
  5. Do the early galaxies observed by JWST disagree with Planck's CMB polarization measurements?
 

Do the early galaxies observed by JWST disagree with Planck's CMB polarization measurements?

Journal
JOURNAL OF COSMOLOGY AND ASTROPARTICLE PHYSICS  
Date Issued
2023
Author(s)
Forconi, Matteo
•
Ruchika, null
•
Melchiorri, Alessandro
•
Mena, Olga
•
MENCI, Nicola  
DOI
10.1088/1475-7516/2023/10/012
Abstract
The recent observations from the James Webb Space Telescope have led to a surprising discovery of a significant density of massive galaxies with masses of M ≥ 1010.5 M ⊙ at redshifts of approximately z ∼ 10. This corresponds to a stellar mass density of roughly ρ * ∼ 106 M ⊙ Mpc-3. Despite making conservative assumptions regarding galaxy formation, this finding may not be compatible with the standard ΛCDM cosmology that is favored by observations of CMB Anisotropies from the Planck satellite. In this paper, we confirm the substantial discrepancy with Planck's results within the ΛCDM framework. Assuming a value of ϵ = 0.2 for the efficiency of converting baryons into stars, we indeed find that the ΛCDM model is excluded at more than 99.7 % confidence level (C.L.). An even more significant exclusion is found for ϵ ∼ 0.1, while a better agreement, but still in tension at more than 95 %, is obtained for ϵ = 0.32. This tension, as already discussed in the literature, could arise either from systematics in the JWST measurements or from new physics. Here, as a last-ditch effort, we point out that disregarding the large angular scale polarization obtained by Planck, which allows for significantly larger values of the matter clustering parameter σ 8, could lead to better agreement between Planck and JWST within the ΛCDM framework. Assuming ΛCDM and no systematics in the current JWST results, this implies either an unknown systematic error in current large angular scale CMB polarization measurements or an unidentified physical mechanism that could lower the expected amount of CMB polarization produced during the epoch of reionization. Interestingly, the model compatible with Planck temperature-only data and JWST observation also favors a higher Hubble constant H 0 = 69.0±1.1 km/s/Mpc at 68% C.L., in better agreement with observations based on SN-Ia luminosity distances.
Volume
2023
Issue
10
Start page
012
Uri
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12386/35558
Url
https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1475-7516/2023/10/012
https://api.elsevier.com/content/abstract/scopus_id/85175036704
Issn Identifier
1475-7516
Rights
open.access
File(s)
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name

Forconi_2023_J._Cosmol._Astropart._Phys._2023_012.pdf

Description
PDF editoriale
Size

808.6 KB

Format

Adobe PDF

Checksum (MD5)

cc63a1257f6b300779b340f7e17d0f64

Explore By
  • Communities and Collection
  • Research Outputs
  • Researchers
  • Organizations
  • Projects
Information and guides for authors
  • https://openaccess-info.inaf.it: all about open access in INAF
  • How to enter a product: guides to OA@INAF
  • The INAF Policy on Open Access
  • Downloadable documents and templates

Built with DSpace-CRIS software - Extension maintained and optimized by 4Science

  • Privacy policy
  • End User Agreement
  • Send Feedback