Repository logo
  • English
  • Italiano
Log In
Have you forgotten your password?
  1. Home
  2. PRODOTTI RICERCA INAF
  3. 1 CONTRIBUTI IN RIVISTE (Journal articles)
  4. 1.01 Articoli in rivista
  5. Synthesis of the morphological description of cometary dust at comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko
 

Synthesis of the morphological description of cometary dust at comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko

Journal
ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS  
Date Issued
2019
Author(s)
Güttler, C.
•
Mannel, T.
•
Rotundi, Alessandra  
•
Merouane, S.
•
FULLE, Marco  
•
Bockelée-Morvan, D.
•
Lasue, J.
•
Levasseur-Regourd, A. C.
•
Blum, J.
•
Naletto, G.
•
Sierks, H.
•
Hilchenbach, M.
•
Tubiana, C.  
•
CAPACCIONI, FABRIZIO  
•
Paquette, J. A.
•
Flandes, A.
•
Moreno, F.
•
Agarwal, J.
•
Bodewits, D.
•
Bertini, I.
•
Tozzi, G. P.
•
Hornung, K.
•
Langevin, Y.
•
Krüger, H.
•
LONGOBARDO, ANDREA  
•
DELLA CORTE, VINCENZO  
•
Tóth, I.
•
FILACCHIONE, GIANRICO  
•
IVANOVSKI, STAVRO LAMBROV  
•
Mottola, S.
•
RINALDI, GIOVANNA  
DOI
10.1051/0004-6361/201834751
Abstract
Before Rosetta, the space missions Giotto and Stardust shaped our view on cometary dust, supported by plentiful data from Earth based observations and interplanetary dust particles collected in the Earth's atmosphere. The Rosetta mission at comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko was equipped with a multitude of instruments designed to study cometary dust. While an abundant amount of data was presented in several individual papers, many focused on a dedicated measurement or topic. Different instruments, methods, and data sources provide different measurement parameters and potentially introduce different biases. This can be an advantage if the complementary aspect of such a complex data set can be exploited. However, it also poses a challenge in the comparison of results in the first place. The aim of this work therefore is to summarize dust results from Rosetta and before. We establish a simple classification as a common framework for intercomparison. This classification is based on the dust particle structure, porosity, and strength and also on its size. Depending on the instrumentation, these are not direct measurement parameters, but we chose them because they were the most reliable for deriving our model. The proposed classification has proved helpful in the Rosetta dust community, and we offer it here also for a broader context. In this manner, we hope to better identify synergies between different instruments and methods in the future.
Volume
630
Start page
A24
Uri
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12386/30808
Url
http://arxiv.org/abs/1902.10634v1
https://www.aanda.org/articles/aa/full_html/2019/10/aa34751-18/aa34751-18.html
Issn Identifier
0004-6361
Ads BibCode
2019A&A...630A..24G
Rights
open.access
File(s)
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name

Guttler_et_al_2009-compressed.pdf

Description
Pdf editoriale
Size

827.93 KB

Format

Adobe PDF

Checksum (MD5)

531cbd2a63a67e009b10d6b9fc125fb0

Explore By
  • Communities and Collection
  • Research Outputs
  • Researchers
  • Organizations
  • Projects
Information and guides for authors
  • https://openaccess-info.inaf.it: all about open access in INAF
  • How to enter a product: guides to OA@INAF
  • The INAF Policy on Open Access
  • Downloadable documents and templates

Built with DSpace-CRIS software - Extension maintained and optimized by 4Science

  • Privacy policy
  • End User Agreement
  • Send Feedback