Repository logo
  • English
  • Italiano
Log In
Have you forgotten your password?
  1. Home
  2. PRODOTTI RICERCA INAF
  3. 1 CONTRIBUTI IN RIVISTE (Journal articles)
  4. 1.01 Articoli in rivista
  5. The evolution of the mass-metallicity relations from the VANDELS survey and the GAEA semi-analytic model
 

The evolution of the mass-metallicity relations from the VANDELS survey and the GAEA semi-analytic model

Journal
MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY  
Date Issued
2021
Author(s)
FONTANOT, Fabio  
•
CALABRO, ANTONELLO  
•
Talia, Margherita  
•
MANNUCCI, FILIPPO  
•
CASTELLANO, MARCO  
•
CRESCI, GIOVANNI  
•
DE LUCIA, GABRIELLA  
•
GALLAZZI, Anna Rita  
•
HIRSCHMANN, Michaela Monika  
•
PENTERICCI, Laura  
•
XIE, Lizhi  
•
Amorin, Ricardo
•
BOLZONELLA, MICOL  
•
BONGIORNO, ANGELA  
•
CUCCIATI, Olga  
•
Cullen, Fergus
•
Fynbo, Johan P. U.
•
Hathi, Nimish
•
Hibon, Pascale
•
McLure, Ross J.
•
POZZETTI, Lucia  
DOI
10.1093/mnras/stab1213
Abstract
In this work, we study the evolution of the mass-metallicity relations (MZRs) as predicted by the GAlaxy Evolution and Assembly (GAEA) semi-analytic model. We contrast these predictions with recent results from the VANDELS survey, which allows us to expand the accessible redshift range for the stellar MZR up to z ~ 3.5. We complement our study by considering the evolution of the gas-phase MZR in the same redshift range. We show that GAEA is able to reproduce the observed evolution of the z < 3.5 gas-phase MZR and z < 0.7 stellar MZR, while it overpredicts the stellar metallicity at z ~ 3.5. Furthermore, GAEA also reproduces the so-called fundamental metallicity relation (FMR) between gas-phase metallicity, stellar mass, and star formation rate (SFR). In particular, the gas-phase FMR in GAEA is already in place at z ~ 5 and shows almost no evolution at lower redshift. GAEA predicts the existence of a stellar FMR that is, however, characterized by a relevant redshift evolution, although its shape follows closely the gas-phase FMR. We also report additional unsolved tensions between model and data: the overall normalization of the predicted MZR agrees with observations only within ~0.1 dex; the largest discrepancies are seen at z ~ 3.5 where models tend to slightly overpredict observed metallicities; the slope of the predicted MZR at fixed SFR is too steep below a few M⊙ yr-1. Finally, we provide model predictions for the evolution of the MZRs at higher redshifts, which would be useful in the context of future surveys, like those that will be performed with James Webb Space Telescope.
Volume
504
Issue
3
Start page
4481
Uri
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12386/31805
Url
https://academic.oup.com/mnras/article/504/3/4481/6258419
http://arxiv.org/abs/2104.08295v2
Issn Identifier
0035-8711
Ads BibCode
2021MNRAS.504.4481F
Rights
open.access
File(s)
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name

stab1213.pdf

Description
Pdf editoriale
Size

1.4 MB

Format

Adobe PDF

Checksum (MD5)

5f6a274e53f0f0d17e135ec9944eee02

Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name

2104.08295.pdf

Description
preprint
Size

541.02 KB

Format

Adobe PDF

Checksum (MD5)

7649a1ea0076ba48acb7d4eafc346b94

Explore By
  • Communities and Collection
  • Research Outputs
  • Researchers
  • Organizations
  • Projects
Information and guides for authors
  • https://openaccess-info.inaf.it: all about open access in INAF
  • How to enter a product: guides to OA@INAF
  • The INAF Policy on Open Access
  • Downloadable documents and templates

Built with DSpace-CRIS software - Extension maintained and optimized by 4Science

  • Privacy policy
  • End User Agreement
  • Send Feedback