Repository logo
  • English
  • Italiano
Log In
Have you forgotten your password?
  1. Home
  2. PRODOTTI RICERCA INAF
  3. 1 CONTRIBUTI IN RIVISTE (Journal articles)
  4. 1.01 Articoli in rivista
  5. VLBI-derived troposphere parameters during CONT08
 

VLBI-derived troposphere parameters during CONT08

Journal
JOURNAL OF GEODESY  
Date Issued
2011
Author(s)
Heinkelmann, R.
•
Böhm, J.
•
Bolotin, S.
•
Engelhardt, G.
•
Haas, R.
•
Lanotte, R.
•
MacMillan, D. S.
•
NEGUSINI, MONIA  
•
Skurikhina, E.
•
Titov, O.
•
Schuh, H.
DOI
10.1007/s00190-011-0459-x
Abstract
Time-series of zenith wet and total troposphere delays as well as north and east gradients are compared, and zenith total delays ( ZTD) are combined on the level of parameter estimates. Input data sets are provided by ten Analysis Centers (ACs) of the International VLBI Service for Geodesy and Astrometry (IVS) for the CONT08 campaign (12-26 August 2008). The inconsistent usage of meteorological data and models, such as mapping functions, causes systematics among the ACs, and differing parameterizations and constraints add noise to the troposphere parameter estimates. The empirical standard deviation of ZTD among the ACs with regard to an unweighted mean is 4.6 mm. The ratio of the analysis noise to the observation noise assessed by the operator/software impact (OSI) model is about 2.5. These and other effects have to be accounted for to improve the intra-technique combination of VLBI-derived troposphere parameters. While the largest systematics caused by inconsistent usage of meteorological data can be avoided and the application of different mapping functions can be considered by applying empirical corrections, the noise has to be modeled in the stochastic model of intra-technique combination. The application of different stochastic models shows no significant effects on the combined parameters but results in different mean formal errors: the mean formal errors of the combined ZTD are 2.3 mm (unweighted), 4.4 mm (diagonal), 8.6 mm [variance component (VC) estimation], and 8.6 mm (operator/software impact, OSI). On the one hand, the OSI model, i.e. the inclusion of off-diagonal elements in the cofactor-matrix, considers the reapplication of observations yielding a factor of about two for mean formal errors as compared to the diagonal approach. On the other hand, the combination based on VC estimation shows large differences among the VCs and exhibits a comparable scaling of formal errors. Thus, for the combination of troposphere parameters a combination of the two extensions of the stochastic model is recommended.
Volume
85
Issue
7
Start page
377
Uri
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12386/34691
Url
https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/#abs/2011JGeod..85..377H
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00190-011-0459-x
Issn Identifier
0949-7714
Rights
open.access
File(s)
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name

Heinkelmann_et al_JoG_2011.pdf

Size

810.69 KB

Format

Adobe PDF

Checksum (MD5)

41f12de467ab5f9a86a1d8e22620fc76

Explore By
  • Communities and Collection
  • Research Outputs
  • Researchers
  • Organizations
  • Projects
Information and guides for authors
  • https://openaccess-info.inaf.it: all about open access in INAF
  • How to enter a product: guides to OA@INAF
  • The INAF Policy on Open Access
  • Downloadable documents and templates

Built with DSpace-CRIS software - Extension maintained and optimized by 4Science

  • Privacy policy
  • End User Agreement
  • Send Feedback