Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: Cosmological constraints from cluster abundances and weak lensing
Journal
Date Issued
2020
Author(s)
Abbott, T. M. C.
•
Aguena, M.
•
Alarcon, A.
•
Allam, S.
•
Allen, S.
•
Annis, J.
•
Avila, S.
•
Bacon, D.
•
Bechtol, K.
•
Bermeo, A.
•
Bernstein, G. M.
•
Bertin, E.
•
Bhargava, S.
•
Bocquet, S.
•
Brooks, D.
•
Brout, D.
•
Buckley-Geer, E.
•
Burke, D. L.
•
Carnero Rosell, A.
•
Carrasco Kind, M.
•
Carretero, J.
•
Castander, F. J.
•
Cawthon, R.
•
Chang, C.
•
Chen, X.
•
Choi, A.
•
Costanzi, M.
•
Crocce, M.
•
da Costa, L. N.
•
Davis, T. M.
•
De Vicente, J.
•
DeRose, J.
•
Desai, S.
•
Diehl, H. T.
•
Dietrich, J. P.
•
Dodelson, S.
•
Doel, P.
•
Drlica-Wagner, A.
•
Eckert, K.
•
Eifler, T. F.
•
Elvin-Poole, J.
•
Estrada, J.
•
Everett, S.
•
Evrard, A. E.
•
Farahi, A.
•
Ferrero, I.
•
Flaugher, B.
•
Fosalba, P.
•
Frieman, J.
•
García-Bellido, J.
•
•
Gaztanaga, E.
•
Gerdes, D. W.
•
Giannantonio, T.
•
Giles, P.
•
•
Gruen, D.
•
Gruendl, R. A.
•
Gschwend, J.
•
Gutierrez, G.
•
Hartley, W. G.
•
Hinton, S. R.
•
Hollowood, D. L.
•
Honscheid, K.
•
Hoyle, B.
•
Huterer, D.
•
James, D. J.
•
Jarvis, M.
•
Jeltema, T.
•
Johnson, M. W. G.
•
Johnson, M. D.
•
Kent, S.
•
Krause, E.
•
Kron, R.
•
Kuehn, K.
•
Kuropatkin, N.
•
Lahav, O.
•
Li, T. S.
•
Lidman, C.
•
Lima, M.
•
Lin, H.
•
MacCrann, N.
•
Maia, M. A. G.
•
Mantz, A.
•
Marshall, J. L.
•
Martini, P.
•
Mayers, J.
•
Melchior, P.
•
Mena-Fernández, J.
•
Menanteau, F.
•
Miquel, R.
•
Mohr, J. J.
•
Nichol, R. C.
•
Nord, B.
•
Ogando, R. L. C.
•
Palmese, A.
•
Paz-Chinchón, F.
•
Plazas, A. A.
•
Prat, J.
•
Rau, M. M.
•
Romer, A. K.
•
Roodman, A.
•
Rooney, P.
•
Rozo, E.
•
Rykoff, E. S.
•
Sako, M.
•
Samuroff, S.
•
Sánchez, C.
•
Sanchez, E.
•
•
Scarpine, V.
•
Schubnell, M.
•
Scolnic, D.
•
Serrano, S.
•
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.
•
Sheldon, E.
•
Smith, J. Allyn.
•
Smith, M.
•
Suchyta, E.
•
Swanson, M. E. C.
•
Tarle, G.
•
Thomas, D.
•
To, C.
•
Troxel, M. A.
•
Tucker, D. L.
•
Varga, T. N.
•
von der Linden, A.
•
Walker, A. R.
•
Wechsler, R. H.
•
Weller, J.
•
Wilkinson, R. D.
•
Wu, H.
•
Yanny, B.
•
Zhang, Y.
•
Zhang, Z.
•
Zuntz, J.
•
DES Collaboration
Abstract
We perform a joint analysis of the counts and weak lensing signal of redMaPPer clusters selected from the Dark Energy Survey (DES) Year 1 dataset. Our analysis uses the same shear and source photometric redshifts estimates as were used in the DES combined probes analysis. Our analysis results in surprisingly low values for S8=σ8(Ωm/0.3 )0.5=0.65 ±0.04 , driven by a low matter density parameter, Ωm=0.17 9-0.038+0.031, with σ8-Ωm posteriors in 2.4 σ tension with the DES Y1 3x2pt results, and in 5.6 σ with the Planck CMB analysis. These results include the impact of post-unblinding changes to the analysis, which did not improve the level of consistency with other data sets compared to the results obtained at the unblinding. The fact that multiple cosmological probes (supernovae, baryon acoustic oscillations, cosmic shear, galaxy clustering and CMB anisotropies), and other galaxy cluster analyses all favor significantly higher matter densities suggests the presence of systematic errors in the data or an incomplete modeling of the relevant physics. Cross checks with x-ray and microwave data, as well as independent constraints on the observable-mass relation from Sunyaev-Zeldovich selected clusters, suggest that the discrepancy resides in our modeling of the weak lensing signal rather than the cluster abundance. Repeating our analysis using a higher richness threshold (λ ≥30 ) significantly reduces the tension with other probes, and points to one or more richness-dependent effects not captured by our model.
Volume
102
Issue
2
Start page
023509
Issn Identifier
2470-0010
Ads BibCode
2020PhRvD.102b3509A
Rights
open.access
File(s)![Thumbnail Image]()
![Thumbnail Image]()
Loading...
Name
2002.11124v1.pdf
Description
Postprint
Size
2.1 MB
Format
Adobe PDF
Checksum (MD5)
c243979c5a5c8b0d5a34d5da66ee58c3
Loading...
Name
PhysRevD.102.023509.pdf
Description
[Administrators only]
Size
2.58 MB
Format
Adobe PDF
Checksum (MD5)
5867da018d504ddf9d893e0702b596aa