Repository logo
  • English
  • Italiano
Log In
Have you forgotten your password?
  1. Home
  2. PRODOTTI RICERCA INAF
  3. 1 CONTRIBUTI IN RIVISTE (Journal articles)
  4. 1.01 Articoli in rivista
  5. Evolutionary and pulsation properties of Type II Cepheids
 

Evolutionary and pulsation properties of Type II Cepheids

Journal
ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS  
Date Issued
2020
Author(s)
Bono, G.
•
Braga, V. F.  
•
FIORENTINO, Giuliana  
•
Salaris, M.
•
PIETRINFERNI, Adriano  
•
CASTELLANI, Marco  
•
DI CRISCIENZO, Marcella  
•
FABRIZIO, Michele  
•
Martínez-Vázquez, C. E.
•
Monelli, M.
DOI
10.1051/0004-6361/202038191
Abstract
We discuss the observed pulsation properties of Type II Cepheids (TIICs) in
the Galaxy and Magellanic Clouds. The period (P) distributions, luminosity amplitudes and population ratios of the three different sub-groups (BL Herculis[BLH, P<5 days], W Virginis [WV, 520 days]) are quite similar in different stellar systems, suggesting a common evolutionary channel and a mild dependence on both metallicity and environment. We present a homogeneous theoretical framework based on Horizontal Branch (HB) evolutionary models, envisaging that TIICs are mainly old (t<10 Gyr), low-mass stars. The BLHs are predicted to be post early asymptotic giant branch (PEAGB) stars (double shell burning) on the verge of reaching their AGB track (first crossing of the instability strip), while WVs are a mix of PEAGB and post-AGB stars (hydrogen shell burning) moving from cool to hot (second crossing). Thus suggesting that they are a single group of variable stars. RVTs are predicted to be a mix of post-AGB stars along their second crossing (short-period tail) and thermally pulsing AGB stars (long-period tail) evolving towards their white dwarf cooling sequence. We also present several sets of synthetic HB models by assuming a bimodal mass distribution along the HB. Theory suggests, in agreement with observations, that TIIC pulsation properties marginally depend on metallicity. Predicted period distributions and population ratios for BLHs agree quite well with observations, while those for WVs and RVTs are almost a factor of two smaller and larger than observed, respectively. Moreover, the predicted period distributions for WVs peak at periods shorter than observed, while those for RVTs display a long period tail not supported by observations. We investigate several avenues to explain these differences, but more detailed calculations are required to address them.
Volume
644
Start page
A96
Uri
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12386/36892
Url
https://www.aanda.org/articles/aa/full_html/2020/12/aa38191-20/aa38191-20.html
http://arxiv.org/abs/2009.06985v2
Issn Identifier
0004-6361
Rights
open.access
File(s)
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name

T2C_evolution_Bono2020.pdf

Description
Pdf editoriale
Size

1.64 MB

Format

Adobe PDF

Checksum (MD5)

92094edde1fd7eae5efedab3471874e9

Explore By
  • Communities and Collection
  • Research Outputs
  • Researchers
  • Organizations
  • Projects
Information and guides for authors
  • https://openaccess-info.inaf.it: all about open access in INAF
  • How to enter a product: guides to OA@INAF
  • The INAF Policy on Open Access
  • Downloadable documents and templates

Built with DSpace-CRIS software - Extension maintained and optimized by 4Science

  • Privacy policy
  • End User Agreement
  • Send Feedback