Repository logo
  • English
  • Italiano
Log In
Have you forgotten your password?
  1. Home
  2. PRODOTTI RICERCA INAF
  3. 1 CONTRIBUTI IN RIVISTE (Journal articles)
  4. 1.01 Articoli in rivista
  5. Microphysics and dynamics of the gamma-ray burst 121024A
 

Microphysics and dynamics of the gamma-ray burst 121024A

Journal
ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS  
Date Issued
2016
Author(s)
Varela, K.
•
van Eerten, H.
•
Greiner, J.
•
Schady, P.
•
Elliott, J.
•
Sudilovsky, V.
•
Krühler, T.
•
van der Horst, A. J.
•
Bolmer, J.
•
Knust, F.
•
Agurto, C.
•
Azagra, F.
•
Belloche, A.
•
Bertoldi, F.
•
De Breuck, C.
•
Delvaux, C.
•
Filgas, R.
•
Graham, J. F.
•
Kann, D. A.
•
Klose, S.
•
Menten, K. M.
•
Nicuesa Guelbenzu, A.
•
Rau, A.
•
ROSSI, Andrea  
•
Schmidl, S.
•
Schuller, F.
•
Schweyer, T.
•
Tanga, M.
•
Weiss, A.
•
Wiseman, P.
•
Wyrowski, F.
DOI
10.1051/0004-6361/201526260
Abstract
Aims: The aim of the study is to constrain the physics of gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) by analysing the multi-wavelength afterglow data set of GRB 121024A that covers the full range from radio to X-rays. Methods: Using multi-epoch broad-band observations of the GRB 121024A afterglow, we measured the three characteristic break frequencies of the synchrotron spectrum. We used six epochs of combined XRT and GROND data to constrain the temporal slopes, the dust extinction, the X-ray absorption, and the spectral slope with high accuracy. Two more epochs of combined data from XRT, GROND, APEX, CARMA, and EVLA were used to set constraints on the break frequencies and therefore on the micro-physical and dynamical parameters. Results: The XRT and GROND light curves show a simultaneous and achromatic break at around 49 ks. As a result, the crossing of the synchrotron cooling break is no suitable explanation for the break in the light curve. The multi-wavelength data allow us to test two plausible scenarios explaining the break: a jet break, and the end of energy injection. The jet-break scenario requires a hard electron spectrum, a very low cooling break frequency, and a non-spreading jet. The energy injection avoids these problems, but requires ∊e > 1 (k = 2), spherical outflow, and ∊B < 10-9. Conclusions: In light of the extreme microphysical parameters required by the energy-injection model, we favour a jet-break scenario where νm < νsa to explain the observations. This scenario gives physically meaningful microphysical parameters, and it also naturally explains the reported detection of linear and circular polarisation.
Volume
589
Start page
A37
Uri
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12386/24310
Url
https://www.aanda.org/articles/aa/abs/2016/05/aa26260-15/aa26260-15.html
Issn Identifier
0004-6361
Ads BibCode
2016A&A...589A..37V
Rights
open.access
File(s)
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name

Varela_microphysicsGRB121024A_2016.pdf

Description
PDF editoriale
Size

1.09 MB

Format

Adobe PDF

Checksum (MD5)

14aacec19789342d23311ab3eb7401f9

Explore By
  • Communities and Collection
  • Research Outputs
  • Researchers
  • Organizations
  • Projects
Information and guides for authors
  • https://openaccess-info.inaf.it: all about open access in INAF
  • How to enter a product: guides to OA@INAF
  • The INAF Policy on Open Access
  • Downloadable documents and templates

Built with DSpace-CRIS software - Extension maintained and optimized by 4Science

  • Privacy policy
  • End User Agreement
  • Send Feedback