Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12386/23117
Title: | Galaxy sizes as a function of environment at intermediate redshift from the ESO Distant Cluster Survey | Authors: | Kelkar, Kshitija Aragón-Salamanca, Alfonso Gray, Meghan E. Maltby, David Vulcani, Benedetta DE LUCIA, GABRIELLA POGGIANTI, Bianca Maria Zaritsky, Dennis |
Issue Date: | 2015 | Journal: | MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY | Number: | 450 | Issue: | 2 | First Page: | 1246 | Abstract: | In order to assess whether the environment has a significant effect on galaxy sizes, we compare the mass--size relations of cluster and field galaxies in the $0.4 < z < 0.8$ redshift range from the ESO Distant Cluster Survey (EDisCS) using HST images. We analyse two mass-selected samples, one defined using photometric redshifts ($10.2 \le \log M_\ast/M_{\odot} \le 12.0$), and a smaller more robust subsample using spectroscopic redshifts ($10.6 \le \log M_\ast/M_{\odot} \le 11.8$). We find no significant difference in the size distributions of cluster and field galaxies of a given morphology. Similarly, we find no significant difference in the size distributions of cluster and field galaxies of similar rest-frame $B-V$ colours. We rule out average size differences larger than $10$--$20$\% in both cases. Consistent conclusions are found with the spectroscopic and photometric samples. These results have important consequences for the physical process(es) responsible for the size evolution of galaxies, and in particular the effect of the environment. The remarkable growth in galaxy size observed from $z\sim2.5$ has been reported to depend on the environment at higher redshifts ($z>1$), with early-type/passive galaxies in higher density environments growing earlier. Such dependence disappears at lower redshifts. Therefore, if the reported difference at higher-$z$ is real, the growth of field galaxies has caught up with that of cluster galaxies by $z\sim1$. Any putative mechanism responsible for galaxy growth has to account for the existence of environmental differences at high redshift and their absence (or weakening) at lower redshifts. | Acknowledgments: | KK would like to thank Boris Häußler for the useful discussions regarding galaxy fitting and galapagos . MEG was supported by an STFC Advanced Fellowship. KK would also like to thank the referee for the useful comments and suggestions that helped in making the content of this paper better. BV was supported by the World Premier International Research Center Initiative (WPI), MEXT, Japan and by the Kakenhi Grant-in-Aid for Young Scientists (B)(26870140) from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS). Based on observations made with the NAS/ESA HST , obtained at the Space Telescope Science Institute, which is operated by the Association of Universities for Research in Astronomy, Inc., under NASA contract NAS 5-26555. These observations are associated with proposal 9476. Support for this proposal was provided by NASA through grant from the Space Telescope Science Institute. Based on observations obtained at the ESO VLT as a part of the Large Programme 166.A-0162 | URI: | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12386/23117 | URL: | http://arxiv.org/abs/1503.08225v1 https://academic.oup.com/mnras/article/450/2/1246/981006 |
ISSN: | 0035-8711 | DOI: | 10.1093/mnras/stv670 | Bibcode ADS: | 2015MNRAS.450.1246K | Fulltext: | open |
Appears in Collections: | 1.01 Articoli in rivista |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
stv670.pdf | 710.38 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Page view(s)
80
checked on Sep 20, 2024
Download(s)
17
checked on Sep 20, 2024
Google ScholarTM
Check
Altmetric
Altmetric
Items in DSpace are published in Open Access, unless otherwise indicated.