Repository logo
  • English
  • Italiano
Log In
Have you forgotten your password?
  1. Home
  2. PRODOTTI RICERCA INAF
  3. 1 CONTRIBUTI IN RIVISTE (Journal articles)
  4. 1.01 Articoli in rivista
  5. The Murchison Widefield Array 21 cm Power Spectrum Analysis Methodology
 

The Murchison Widefield Array 21 cm Power Spectrum Analysis Methodology

Journal
THE ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL  
Date Issued
2016
Author(s)
Jacobs, Daniel C.
•
Hazelton, B. J.
•
Trott, C. M.
•
Dillon, Joshua S.
•
Pindor, B.
•
Sullivan, I. S.
•
Pober, J. C.
•
Barry, N.
•
Beardsley, A. P.
•
BERNARDI, GIANNI  
•
Bowman, Judd D.
•
Briggs, F.
•
Cappallo, R. J.
•
Carroll, P.
•
Corey, B. E.
•
de Oliveira-Costa, A.
•
Emrich, D.
•
Ewall-Wice, A.
•
Feng, L.
•
Gaensler, B. M.
•
Goeke, R.
•
Greenhill, L. J.
•
Hewitt, J. N.
•
Hurley-Walker, N.
•
Johnston-Hollitt, M.
•
Kaplan, D. L.
•
Kasper, J. C.
•
Kim, HS
•
Kratzenberg, E.
•
Lenc, E.
•
Line, J.
•
Loeb, A.
•
Lonsdale, C. J.
•
Lynch, M. J.
•
McKinley, B.
•
McWhirter, S. R.
•
Mitchell, D. A.
•
Morales, M. F.
•
Morgan, E.
•
Neben, A. R.
•
Thyagarajan, N.
•
Oberoi, D.
•
Offringa, A. R.
•
Ord, S. M.
•
Paul, S.
•
Prabu, T.
•
Procopio, P.
•
Riding, J.
•
Rogers, A. E. E.
•
Roshi, A.
•
Udaya Shankar, N.
•
Sethi, Shiv K.
•
Srivani, K. S.
•
Subrahmanyan, R.
•
Tegmark, M.
•
Tingay, S. J.
•
Waterson, M.
•
Wayth, R. B.
•
Webster, R. L.
•
Whitney, A. R.
•
Williams, A.
•
Williams, C. L.
•
Wu, C.
•
Wyithe, J. S. B.
DOI
10.3847/0004-637X/825/2/114
Abstract
We present the 21 cm power spectrum analysis approach of the Murchison Widefield Array Epoch of Reionization project. In this paper, we compare the outputs of multiple pipelines for the purpose of validating statistical limits cosmological hydrogen at redshifts between 6 and 12. Multiple independent data calibration and reduction pipelines are used to make power spectrum limits on a fiducial night of data. Comparing the outputs of imaging and power spectrum stages highlights differences in calibration, foreground subtraction, and power spectrum calculation. The power spectra found using these different methods span a space defined by the various tradeoffs between speed, accuracy, and systematic control. Lessons learned from comparing the pipelines range from the algorithmic to the prosaically mundane; all demonstrate the many pitfalls of neglecting reproducibility. We briefly discuss the way these different methods attempt to handle the question of evaluating a significant detection in the presence of foregrounds.
Volume
825
Issue
2
Start page
114
Uri
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12386/26310
Url
https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.3847/0004-637X/825/2/114
Issn Identifier
0004-637X
Ads BibCode
2016ApJ...825..114J
Rights
open.access
File(s)
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name

Jacobs2016.pdf

Description
Pdf editoriale
Size

7.62 MB

Format

Adobe PDF

Checksum (MD5)

64671862467411512413be7c330ccbfa

Explore By
  • Communities and Collection
  • Research Outputs
  • Researchers
  • Organizations
  • Projects
Information and guides for authors
  • https://openaccess-info.inaf.it: all about open access in INAF
  • How to enter a product: guides to OA@INAF
  • The INAF Policy on Open Access
  • Downloadable documents and templates

Built with DSpace-CRIS software - Extension maintained and optimized by 4Science

  • Privacy policy
  • End User Agreement
  • Send Feedback