Repository logo
  • English
  • Italiano
Log In
Have you forgotten your password?
  1. Home
  2. PRODOTTI RICERCA INAF
  3. 1 CONTRIBUTI IN RIVISTE (Journal articles)
  4. 1.01 Articoli in rivista
  5. The High Cadence Transient Survey (HITS). I. Survey Design and Supernova Shock Breakout Constraints
 

The High Cadence Transient Survey (HITS). I. Survey Design and Supernova Shock Breakout Constraints

Journal
THE ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL  
Date Issued
2016
Author(s)
Förster, F.
•
Maureira, J. C.
•
San Martín, J.
•
Hamuy, M.
•
Martínez, J.
•
Huijse, P.
•
Cabrera, G.
•
Galbany, L.
•
de Jaeger, Th.
•
González─Gaitán, S.
•
Anderson, J. P.
•
Kunkarayakti, H.
•
Pignata, G.
•
BUFANO, FILOMENA  
•
Littín, J.
•
Olivares, F.
•
Medina, G.
•
Smith, R. C.
•
Vivas, A. K.
•
Estévez, P. A.
•
Muñoz, R.
•
Vera, E.
DOI
10.3847/0004-637X/832/2/155
Abstract
We present the first results of the High Cadence Transient Survey (HiTS), a survey for which the objective is to detect and follow-up optical transients with characteristic timescales from hours to days, especially the earliest hours of supernova (SN) explosions. HiTS uses the Dark Energy Camera and a custom pipeline for image subtraction, candidate filtering and candidate visualization, which runs in real-time to be able to react rapidly to the new transients. We discuss the survey design, the technical challenges associated with the real-time analysis of these large volumes of data and our first results. In our 2013, 2014, and 2015 campaigns, we detected more than 120 young SN candidates, but we did not find a clear signature from the short-lived SN shock breakouts (SBOs) originating after the core collapse of red supergiant stars, which was the initial science aim of this survey. Using the empirical distribution of limiting magnitudes from our observational campaigns, we measured the expected recovery fraction of randomly injected SN light curves, which included SBO optical peaks produced with models from Tominaga et al. (2011) and Nakar & Sari (2010). From this analysis, we cannot rule out the models from Tominaga et al. (2011) under any reasonable distributions of progenitor masses, but we can marginally rule out the brighter and longer-lived SBO models from Nakar & Sari (2010) under our best-guess distribution of progenitor masses. Finally, we highlight the implications of this work for future massive data sets produced by astronomical observatories, such as LSST.
Volume
832
Issue
2
Start page
155
Uri
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12386/26586
Url
https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.3847/0004-637X/832/2/155
Issn Identifier
0004-637X
Ads BibCode
2016ApJ...832..155F
Rights
open.access
File(s)
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name

Förster+16.pdf

Description
Pdf editoriale
Size

2.16 MB

Format

Adobe PDF

Checksum (MD5)

450ab5610db1bdbbb2bf3146eb34918d

Explore By
  • Communities and Collection
  • Research Outputs
  • Researchers
  • Organizations
  • Projects
Information and guides for authors
  • https://openaccess-info.inaf.it: all about open access in INAF
  • How to enter a product: guides to OA@INAF
  • The INAF Policy on Open Access
  • Downloadable documents and templates

Built with DSpace-CRIS software - Extension maintained and optimized by 4Science

  • Privacy policy
  • End User Agreement
  • Send Feedback