Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title:||Correlation between peak energy and Fourier power density spectrum slope in gamma-ray bursts||Authors:||Dichiara, S.
|Issue Date:||2016||Journal:||ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS||Number:||589||First Page:||A97||Abstract:||Context. The origin of the gamma-ray burst (GRB) prompt emission still defies explanation, in spite of recent progress made, for example, on the occasional presence of a thermal component in the spectrum along with the ubiquitous non-thermal component that is modelled with a Band function. The combination of finite duration and aperiodic modulations make GRBs hard to characterise temporally. Although correlations between GRB luminosity and spectral hardness on one side and time variability on the other side have long been known, the loose and often arbitrary definition of the latter makes the interpretation uncertain. <BR /> Aims: We characterise the temporal variability in an objective way and search for a connection with rest-frame spectral properties for a number of well-observed GRBs. <BR /> Methods: We studied the individual power density spectra (PDS) of 123 long GRBs with measured redshift, rest-frame peak energy E<SUB>p,I</SUB> of the time-averaged ν F<SUB>ν</SUB> spectrum, and well-constrained PDS slope α detected with Swift, Fermi and past spacecraft. The PDS were modelled with a power law either with or without a break adopting a Bayesian Markov chain Monte Carlo technique. <BR /> Results: We find a highly significant E<SUB>p,I</SUB>-α anti-correlation. The null hypothesis probability is ~10<SUP>-9</SUP>. <BR /> Conclusions: In the framework of the internal shock synchrotron model, the E<SUB>p,I</SUB>-α anti-correlation can hardly be reconciled with the predicted E<SUB>p,I</SUB> ∝ Γ<SUP>-2</SUP>, unless either variable microphysical parameters of the shocks or continual electron acceleration are assumed. Alternatively, in the context of models based on magnetic reconnection, the PDS slope and E<SUB>p,I</SUB> are linked to the ejecta magnetisation at the dissipation site, so that more magnetised outflows would produce more variable GRB light curves at short timescales (≲1 s), shallower PDS, and higher values of E<SUB>p,I</SUB>. <P />Full Table 1 is only available at the CDS via anonymous ftp to <A href="http://cdsarc.u-strasbg.fr">http://cdsarc.u-strasbg.fr</A> (ftp://22.214.171.124) or via <A href="http://cdsarc.u-strasbg.fr/viz-bin/qcat?J/A+A/589/A97">http://cdsarc.u-strasbg.fr/viz-bin/qcat?J/A+A/589/A97||URI:||http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12386/27169||URL:||https://www.aanda.org/articles/aa/abs/2016/05/aa27635-15/aa27635-15.html||ISSN:||0004-6361||DOI:||10.1051/0004-6361/201527635||Bibcode ADS:||2016A&A...589A..97D||Fulltext:||open|
|Appears in Collections:||1.01 Articoli in rivista|
Show full item record
Files in This Item:
|aa27635-15.pdf||Pdf editoriale||380.46 kB||Adobe PDF||View/Open|
checked on Sep 24, 2020
checked on Sep 24, 2020
Items in DSpace are published in Open Access, unless otherwise indicated.