Repository logo
  • English
  • Italiano
Log In
Have you forgotten your password?
  1. Home
  2. PRODOTTI RICERCA INAF
  3. 1 CONTRIBUTI IN RIVISTE (Journal articles)
  4. 1.01 Articoli in rivista
  5. Statistical analysis of probability density functions for photometric redshifts through the KiDS-ESO-DR3 galaxies
 

Statistical analysis of probability density functions for photometric redshifts through the KiDS-ESO-DR3 galaxies

Journal
MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY  
Date Issued
2019
Author(s)
Amaro, V.
•
CAVUOTI, STEFANO  
•
BRESCIA, Massimo  
•
Vellucci, C.
•
Longo, G.
•
Bilicki, M.
•
de Jong, J. T. A.
•
TORTORA, CRESCENZO  
•
RADOVICH, MARIO  
•
NAPOLITANO, NICOLA ROSARIO  
•
Buddelmeijer, H.
DOI
10.1093/mnras/sty2922
Abstract
Despite the high accuracy of photometric redshifts (zphot) derived using machine learning (ML) methods, the quantification of errors through reliable and accurate probability density functions (PDFs) is still an open problem. First, because it is difficult to accurately assess the contribution from different sources of errors, namely internal to the method itself and from the photometric features defining the available parameter space. Secondly, because the problem of defining a robust statistical method, always able to quantify and qualify the PDF estimation validity, is still an open issue. We present a comparison among PDFs obtained using three different methods on the same data set: two ML techniques, METAPHOR (Machine-learning Estimation Tool for Accurate PHOtometric Redshifts) and ANNz2 , plus the spectral energy distribution template-fitting method, BPZ (Bayesian photometric redshift). The photometric data were extracted from the Kilo Degree Survey ESO Data Release 3, while the spectroscopy was obtained from the Galaxy and Mass Assembly Data Release 2. The statistical evaluation of both individual and stacked PDFs was done through quantitative and qualitative estimators, including a dummy PDF, useful to verify whether different statistical estimators can correctly assess PDF quality. We conclude that, in order to quantify the reliability and accuracy of any zphot PDF method, a combined set of statistical estimators is required.
Volume
482
Issue
3
Start page
3116
Uri
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12386/28800
Url
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/sty2922
https://academic.oup.com/mnras/article-abstract/482/3/3116/5149510?redirectedFrom=fulltext
Issn Identifier
0035-8711
Ads BibCode
2019MNRAS.482.3116A
Rights
open.access
File(s)
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name

AmaroetAlsty2922.pdf

Description
Pdf editoriale
Size

3.89 MB

Format

Adobe PDF

Checksum (MD5)

df9828730d37959a32ac4c7332fc5ed5

Explore By
  • Communities and Collection
  • Research Outputs
  • Researchers
  • Organizations
  • Projects
Information and guides for authors
  • https://openaccess-info.inaf.it: all about open access in INAF
  • How to enter a product: guides to OA@INAF
  • The INAF Policy on Open Access
  • Downloadable documents and templates

Built with DSpace-CRIS software - Extension maintained and optimized by 4Science

  • Privacy policy
  • End User Agreement
  • Send Feedback