Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12386/28982
Title: | The XMM-Newton wide field survey in the COSMOS field: Clustering dependence of X-ray selected AGN on host galaxy properties | Authors: | Viitanen, A. Allevato, V. Finoguenov, A. BONGIORNO, ANGELA Cappelluti, N. GILLI, Roberto Miyaji, T. Salvato, M. |
Issue Date: | 2019 | Journal: | ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS | Number: | 629 | First Page: | A14 | Abstract: | Aims: We study the spatial clustering of 632 (1130) XMM-COSMOS active galactic nuclei (AGNs) with known spectroscopic or photometric redshifts in the range z = [0.1-2.5] in order to measure the AGN bias and estimate the typical mass of the hosting dark matter (DM) halo as a function of AGN host galaxy properties. <BR /> Methods: We created AGN subsamples in terms of stellar mass, M<SUB>*</SUB>, and specific black hole accretion rate, L<SUB>X</SUB>/M<SUB>*</SUB>, to study how AGN environment depends on these quantities. Further, we derived the M<SUB>*</SUB>-M<SUB>halo</SUB> relation for our sample of XMM-COSMOS AGNs and compared it to results in literature for normal non-active galaxies. We measured the projected two-point correlation function w<SUB>p</SUB>(r<SUB>p</SUB>) using both the classic and the generalized clustering estimator, based on photometric redshifts, as probability distribution functions in addition to any available spectroscopic redshifts. We measured the large-scale (r<SUB>p</SUB> ≳ 1 h<SUP>-1</SUP> Mpc) linear bias b by comparing the clustering signal to that expected of the underlying DM distribution. The bias was then related to the typical mass of the hosting halo M<SUB>halo</SUB> of our AGN subsamples. Since M<SUB>*</SUB> and L<SUB>X</SUB>/M<SUB>*</SUB> are correlated, we matched the distribution in terms of one quantity and we split the distribution in the other. <BR /> Results: For the full spectroscopic AGN sample, we measured a typical DM halo mass of log (M<SUB>halo</SUB>/h<SUP>-1</SUP> M<SUB>☉</SUB>) = 12.79<SUB>-0.43</SUB><SUP>+0.26</SUP>, similar to galaxy group environments and in line with previous studies for moderate-luminosity X-ray selected AGN. We find no significant dependence on specific accretion rate L<SUB>X</SUB>/M<SUB>*</SUB>, with log (M<SUB>halo</SUB>/h<SUP>-1</SUP> M<SUB>☉</SUB>) = 13.06<SUB>-0.38</SUB><SUP>+0.23</SUP> and log (M<SUB>halo</SUB>/h<SUP>-1</SUP> M<SUB>☉</SUB>) = 12.97<SUB>-1.26</SUB><SUP>+0.39</SUP> for low and high L<SUB>X</SUB>/M<SUB>*</SUB> subsamples, respectively. We also find no difference in the hosting halos in terms of M<SUB>*</SUB> with log (M<SUB>halo</SUB>/h<SUP>-1</SUP> M<SUB>☉</SUB>) = 12.93<SUB>-0.62</SUB><SUP>+0.31</SUP> (low) and log (M<SUB>halo</SUB>/h<SUP>-1</SUP> M<SUB>☉</SUB>) = 12.90<SUB>-0.62</SUB><SUP>+0.30</SUP> (high). By comparing the M<SUB>*</SUB>-M<SUB>halo</SUB> relation derived for XMM-COSMOS AGN subsamples with what is expected for normal non-active galaxies by abundance matching and clustering results, we find that the typical DM halo mass of our high M<SUB>*</SUB> AGN subsample is similar to that of non-active galaxies. However, AGNs in our low M<SUB>*</SUB> subsample are found in more massive halos than non-active galaxies. By excluding AGNs in galaxy groups from the clustering analysis, we find evidence that the result for low M<SUB>*</SUB> may be due to larger fraction of AGNs as satellites in massive halos. | URI: | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12386/28982 | URL: | https://www.aanda.org/articles/aa/abs/2019/09/aa35186-19/aa35186-19.html | ISSN: | 0004-6361 | DOI: | 10.1051/0004-6361/201935186 | Bibcode ADS: | 2019A&A...629A..14V | Fulltext: | open |
Appears in Collections: | 1.01 Articoli in rivista |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Viitanen1906.07911.pdf | postprint | 1.12 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
aa 629 A14.pdf | Pdf editoriale | 1.49 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Page view(s)
61
checked on Sep 11, 2024
Download(s)
27
checked on Sep 11, 2024
Google ScholarTM
Check
Altmetric
Altmetric
Items in DSpace are published in Open Access, unless otherwise indicated.