Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12386/34085
Title: | A Deep Learning Method for AGILE-GRID Gamma-Ray Burst Detection | Authors: | PARMIGGIANI, NICOLO BULGARELLI, ANDREA FIORETTI, VALENTINA DI PIANO, AMBRA GIULIANI, ANDREA Longo, F. VERRECCHIA, Francesco TAVANI, MARCO Beneventano, D. Macaluso, A. |
Issue Date: | 2021 | Journal: | THE ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL | Number: | 914 | Issue: | 1 | First Page: | 67 | Abstract: | The follow-up of external science alerts received from gamma-ray burst (GRB) and gravitational wave detectors is one of the AGILE Team's current major activities. The AGILE team developed an automated real-time analysis pipeline to analyze AGILE Gamma-Ray Imaging Detector (GRID) data to detect possible counterparts in the energy range 0.1-10 GeV. This work presents a new approach for detecting GRBs using a convolutional neural network (CNN) to classify the AGILE-GRID intensity maps by improving the GRB detection capability over the Li & Ma method, currently used by the AGILE team. The CNN is trained with large simulated data sets of intensity maps. The AGILE complex observing pattern due to the so-called "spinning mode" is studied to prepare data sets to test and evaluate the CNN. A GRB emission model is defined from the second Fermi-LAT GRB catalog and convoluted with the AGILE observing pattern. Different p-value distributions are calculated, evaluating, using the CNN, millions of background-only maps simulated by varying the background level. The CNN is then used on real data to analyze the AGILE-GRID data archive, searching for GRB detections using the trigger time and position taken from the Swift-BAT, Fermi-GBM, and Fermi-LAT GRB catalogs. From these catalogs, the CNN detects 21 GRBs with a significance of ≥3&sgr;, while the Li & Ma method detects only two GRBs. The results shown in this work demonstrate that the CNN is more effective in detecting GRBs than the Li & Ma method in this context and can be implemented into the AGILE-GRID real-time analysis pipeline. | URI: | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12386/34085 | URL: | https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.3847/1538-4357/abfa15 https://api.elsevier.com/content/abstract/scopus_id/85108986240 |
ISSN: | 0004-637X | DOI: | 10.3847/1538-4357/abfa15 | Bibcode ADS: | 2021ApJ...914...67P | Fulltext: | open |
Appears in Collections: | 1.01 Articoli in rivista |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Parmiggiani_2021_ApJ_914_67.pdf | Pdf editoriale | 1.86 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Page view(s)
104
checked on Apr 22, 2025
Download(s)
22
checked on Apr 22, 2025
Google ScholarTM
Check
Altmetric
Altmetric
Items in DSpace are published in Open Access, unless otherwise indicated.