Do Current X-Ray Observations Capture Most of the Black-hole Accretion at High Redshifts?
Journal
Date Issued
2021
Author(s)
Yang, Guang
•
Estrada-Carpenter, Vicente
•
Papovich, Casey
•
•
Walsh, Jonelle L.
•
Yao, Zhiyuan
•
Yuan, Feng
Abstract
The cosmic black hole accretion density (BHAD) is critical for our understanding of the formation and evolution of supermassive black holes (BHs). However, at high redshifts (z > 3), X-ray observations report BHADs significantly (∼10 times) lower than those predicted by cosmological simulations. It is therefore paramount to constrain the high-z BHAD using independent methods other than direct X-ray detections. The recently established relation between star formation rate and BH accretion rate among bulge-dominated galaxies provides such a chance, as it enables an estimate of the BHAD from the star formation histories (SFHs) of lower-redshift objects. Using the CANDELS Lyα Emission At Reionization (CLEAR) survey, we model the SFHs for a sample of 108 bulge-dominated galaxies at z = 0.7-1.5, and further estimate the BHAD contributed by their high-z progenitors. The predicted BHAD at z ≈ 4-5 is consistent with the simulation-predicted values, but higher than the X-ray measurements (by ≈3-10 times at z = 4-5). Our result suggests that the current X-ray surveys could be missing many heavily obscured Compton-thick active galactic nuclei (AGNs) at high redshifts. However, this BHAD estimation assumes that the high-z progenitors of our z = 0.7-1.5 sample remain bulge-dominated where star formation is correlated with BH cold-gas accretion. Alternatively, our prediction could signify a stark decline in the fraction of bulges in high-z galaxies (with an associated drop in BH accretion). JWST and Origins will resolve the discrepancy between our predicted BHAD and the X-ray results by constraining Compton-thick AGN and bulge evolution at high redshifts.
Volume
921
Issue
2
Start page
170
Issn Identifier
0004-637X
Rights
open.access
File(s)![Thumbnail Image]()
Loading...
Name
Yang_2021_ApJ_921_170.pdf
Description
PDF editoriale
Size
953.79 KB
Format
Adobe PDF
Checksum (MD5)
2734596a7a3753289d24f59b02ed5fb4