Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12386/31684
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Blot, Linda | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Crocce, Martin | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | SEFUSATTI, Emiliano | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Lippich, Martha | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Sánchez, Ariel G. | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Colavincenzo, Manuel | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Monaco, Pierluigi | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Alvarez, Marcelo A. | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Agrawal, Aniket | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Avila, Santiago | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Balaguera-Antolínez, Andrés | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Bond, Richard | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Codis, Sandrine | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Dalla Vecchia, Claudio | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Dorta, Antonio | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Fosalba, Pablo | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Izard, Albert | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Kitaura, Francisco-Shu | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Pellejero-Ibanez, Marcos | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Stein, George | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Vakili, Mohammadjavad | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Yepes, Gustavo | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-03-17T16:05:01Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2022-03-17T16:05:01Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2019 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 0035-8711 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12386/31684 | - |
dc.description.abstract | We study the accuracy of several approximate methods for gravitational dynamics in terms of halo power spectrum multipoles and their estimated covariance matrix. We propagate the differences in covariances into parameter constraints related to growth rate of structure, Alcock-Paczynski distortions, and biasing. We consider seven methods in three broad categories: algorithms that solve for halo density evolution deterministically using Lagrangian trajectories (ICE-COLA, PINOCCHIO, and PEAKPATCH), methods that rely on halo assignment schemes on to dark matter overdensities calibrated with a target N-body run (HALOGEN, PATCHY), and two standard assumptions about the full density probability distribution function (Gaussian and lognormal). We benchmark their performance against a set of three hundred N-body simulations, running similar sets of approximate simulations with matched initial conditions, for each method. We find that most methods reproduce the monopole to within 5{{ per cent}}, while residuals for the quadrupole are sometimes larger and scale dependent. The variance of the multipoles is typically reproduced within 10{{ per cent}}. Overall, we find that covariances built from approximate simulations yield errors on model parameters within 10{{ per cent}} of those from the N-body-based covariance. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | eng | en_US |
dc.title | Comparing approximate methods for mock catalogues and covariance matrices II: power spectrum multipoles | en_US |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1093/mnras/stz507 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopus | 2-s2.0-85066989157 | en_US |
dc.identifier.url | https://academic.oup.com/mnras/article/485/2/2806/5342086 | en_US |
dc.relation.medium | STAMPA | en_US |
dc.relation.volume | 485 | en_US |
dc.relation.issue | 2 | en_US |
dc.relation.firstpage | 2806 | en_US |
dc.type.referee | REF_1 | en_US |
dc.description.numberofauthors | 22 | en_US |
dc.description.international | sì | en_US |
dc.contributor.country | ITA | en_US |
dc.contributor.country | USA | en_US |
dc.contributor.country | GBR | en_US |
dc.contributor.country | FRA | en_US |
dc.contributor.country | DEU | en_US |
dc.contributor.country | ESP | en_US |
dc.contributor.country | CAN | en_US |
dc.contributor.country | NLD | en_US |
dc.relation.scientificsector | FIS/05 - ASTRONOMIA E ASTROFISICA | en_US |
dc.relation.journal | MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY | en_US |
dc.type.miur | 262 Articolo in rivista | - |
dc.identifier.adsbibcode | 2019MNRAS.485.2806B | en_US |
dc.relation.ercsector | ERC sectors::Physical Sciences and Engineering::PE9 Universe sciences: astro-physics/chemistry/biology; solar systems; stellar, galactic and extragalactic astronomy, planetary systems, cosmology, space science, instrumentation::PE9_14 Cosmology | en_US |
dc.description.apc | no | en_US |
dc.description.oa | 1 – prodotto con file in versione Open Access (allegare il file al passo 5-Carica) | en_US |
item.openairecristype | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf | - |
item.openairetype | Article | - |
item.languageiso639-1 | en | - |
item.fulltext | With Fulltext | - |
item.cerifentitytype | Publications | - |
item.grantfulltext | open | - |
crisitem.journal.journalissn | 0035-8711 | - |
crisitem.journal.ance | E112946 | - |
crisitem.author.dept | O.A. Trieste | - |
crisitem.author.orcid | 0000-0003-0473-1567 | - |
Appears in Collections: | 1.01 Articoli in rivista |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
1806.09497.pdf | postprint | 1.71 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
stz507.pdf | Pdf editoriale | 2.22 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Page view(s)
31
checked on Aug 7, 2024
Download(s)
22
checked on Aug 7, 2024
Google ScholarTM
Check
Altmetric
Altmetric
Items in DSpace are published in Open Access, unless otherwise indicated.